I only partly agree with the film’s argument that these technologies are an “existential threat” to our wellbeing. This is because while I do believe there should be a little cut back on the reliance on technology and that we shouldn’t believe everything we see on the internet, technology is still a great tool when used properly and isn’t relied upon for everything. I believe they are overreacting regarding the film’s statement; I personally don’t believe the entire world will burn in the future due to technology. I believe that the solution to this technological problem is to just “take a step back” on the reliance, but personally I believe that it is too late to make this change.
Month: October 2024
Recent Posts
- 1.) What are the actual questions these two articles are debating? Try to articulate what the debate itself is over. 2.) For your assigned article, write a one sentence summary of the argument, followed by 3 supporting claims. 3.) To what extent do you agree or disagree with the argument being made in this article and why?
- Serano discusses something she calls “the predator/prey mindset.” What is it and how does it lead to various negative stereotypes for both men and women? How does this relate to the “nice guy/asshole” double bind she discusses later?
- To what extent do you agree with the film’s central premise that these technologies represent an “existential threat” to our lives? Are they overreacting or is the threat really that dangerous? Is there a solution to how these technologies are run, or is it too late to make a change?
- Hello world!